Comments on: Artistic videojournalism (two examples)

By: Kodak Zi8: the tool to change video journalism? « Adam Westbrook

Kodak Zi8: the tool to change video journalism? « Adam Westbrook — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:26:50 +0000

[...] you just have to watch this film by PNW Local (previously featured on this blog) to see the potential. It was shot entirely on the [...]

By: paulbalcerak

paulbalcerak — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:35:34 +0000

Very good point.

By: Mary Hamilton

Mary Hamilton — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:33:18 +0000

Audio issues – I simply mean that a lot of people view videos at work or in other environments where sound might be blocked or turned down. Others will use state-of-the-art equipment that enhance every pin dropped. It’s hard to predict what your users will be able to listen to, so simple tends to work for everyone whereas complicated or wordy voiceover tends not to.

By: paulbalcerak

paulbalcerak — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:17:35 +0000

I agree (though I’m not really sure what “audio issues” you mean).

I think another thing to consider is that the whole idea of an anchorperson, or at least the whole anchorman persona/reporting style, was to give you a “buddy”—someone you could relate to—to sort of personalize the news. That idea is a little passé in light of social media, given that you can choose who your buddies are or create virtual “buddies” (i.e. Google Reader) that deliver your news to you.

By: Mary Hamilton

Mary Hamilton — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:04:56 +0000

There seems to be a move towards a sort of full-screen journalism on the web – perhaps partly because of the audio issues online? It’s refreshing to be shown rather than told what the story is.

By: paulbalcerak

paulbalcerak — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:02:59 +0000

@Mary - I don't want to bash broadcast journalists too much, but there is an element of "on a date with your mom supervising" at work—how are you supposed to have this visceral connection with the subject of the story when there's another person moderating the whole thing? (Never mind the Ron Burgundy-like puns and overall goofiness that some broadcasters embody.) @Paul - Funny you should mention that—Andrew did another video for us a while back (also on transportation) where he mixed stills with video.

By: Paul Treacy

Paul Treacy — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:20:02 +0000

This is very refreshing stuff. I’m a stills guy in the process of becoming a motion capture guy and so I’m ready to learn.

I want to use stills in my videos and so I hope to figure out an artistic way of using my stills as b-roll which means capturing the audio independently.

As yet, I don’t have all the gear I need but I’m getting there. Hopefully by Christmas I’ll be fully kitted out to tell stories from south London.

Thanks for this, Paul.
http://paultreacy.com/video

By: Mary Hamilton

Mary Hamilton — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:26:55 +0000

Both these videos are beautiful. The first particularly so – it doesn’t just tell the story, it shows what it was really like. There’s so much empathy there, and the absence of a traditional reporter figure means there’s nothing to get between the viewer and the man who’s stuck. It’s very moving and very human and very real.

I like the point you’ve made too about its timelessness. So often in newsgathering we end up focussing on the new, the now, the facts – but that video removes all context apart from the opening slides, which makes it both immediate and universal. It takes a story that could be very location- and time-specific and makes it relevant to everyone.

Plus it’s not all that often that we get to say news is beautiful. It should happen more.

By: A snapshot of how video journalism should be « Adam Westbrook

A snapshot of how video journalism should be « Adam Westbrook — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:52:03 +0000

[...] A snapshot of how video journalism should be Posted in Journalism by adamwestbrook on September 30, 2009 A big hats off to US journalist Paul Balcerak, who has found and posted two examples of what he calls artistic video journalism. [...]

By: paulbalcerak

paulbalcerak — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:02:04 +0000

This is exactly my argument for artistic news, too: “…I’ve never heard of the town featured, or care about its transportation issues, but I watched the whole thing through.” I know it takes extra time to produce, but if good looking news is going to increase time on site (time spent watching videos, whatever), isn’t it worth it?

The thing I especially like about No. 1 is its viral/timeless quality. I could’ve watched this video last week, yesterday or five years from now and it would still have the same impact. The problem with news right now is that its shelf life is extremely short. Taking a more artistic approach seems to me one way of increasing the chances that a news piece will be passed around days, months, years down the road.