≡ Menu

I won't even *link* to NYTimes.com if they charge

3 Flares Twitter 2 Facebook 0 Pin It Share 0 LinkedIn 1 Buffer 0 Email -- Filament.io 3 Flares ×
NYC: New York Times Building

Source: wallyg's Flickr stream.

Will people pay for the New York Times online? | Old Media, New Tricks.

My answer: I won’t. And not only won’t I pay, but I’ll also go out of my way to not link to the New York Times. This isn’t me taking a stand against paywalls. If The New York Times believes their content is worth X amount and is willing to charge for it, I say bravo and way to have the guts to do something other than talk.

My problem with NYT’s metered plan (any paywall, really) is that it diminishes the value of a link that I may post.

Here’s why: I’m cruising around and I find an article on NYT’s site and I decide I’m going to blog about that article. I haven’t hit my monthly limit yet on how many NYT articles I can read, so I post it to my blog and it’s all good. Now let’s say 100 people view that blog post (optimistic, I know)—any number of those 100 may have already hit their NYT limit for the month. In other words, my blog post is mostly useless to anywhere between zero and 100 percent of my readers, that number can fluctuate daily and I have no way of knowing what that number actually is.

I said this on my company blog once: When you start to wall yourself off from the rest of the Internet, you become less of a Web site and more of a “rope site.” A Web is sticky—it makes connections so it can hang onto whatever comes into it (re: readers). A rope is something someone can just slip off of when they reach the end of it. No one’s coming back to a blog that regularly links to nowhere (for all intents and purposes). I’d do just as well to not link at all.

Update: Jay Rosen chimed in with these thoughts (among others) on NPR:

If the real part of The New York Times is its influcence, then this is a very risky move with the very heart and soul of the newspaper, which is its ability to affect and influence public conversation.

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • Eric

    I appreciate the NYT’s desire to make money, but you’re right about what a paywall will do to the paper’s inbound links and ability to influence public conversations.

  • I think it’s smart to look for multiple sources of revenue; I just think, like Jay Rosen said, it’s a huge gamble to make one of those sources customer subscriptions. I also wonder whether these ideas are based in principle or in the reasoning of sound business practices.

  • Eric

    True. They are taking a big risk. Some interesting information from VentureBeat on how the paywalled WSJ site compares to the current NYT site in terms of attracting traffic from Facebook, blogs, and Twitter. The WSJ may not have as many social-media-savvy subscribers, but the numbers are still pretty telling.

    http://venturebeat.com/2010/01/20/will-the-new-york-times-meter-kill-traffic-from-social-media/

  • Good point/good link. My only issue with comparing the Wall Street Journal to other news outlets is that the WSJ can get away with charging for access because it offers a tangible benefit to one’s investment—namely, their business/stock tips offer an opportunity for the subscriber to make money. The same goes for ESPN and other sports journalism sites who charge for premium accounts; a person will pay for extra analysis on ESPN because it represents an opportunity to make money gambling.

    The fundamental problem with The New York Times or any other site that brokers exclusively in general information and wants to charge for it is that the information is freely available on thousands of other sites. WSJ/ESPN are able to charge because people can expect to make money off of the money they put into the sites. It’s much more difficult to convince someone that there’s material gain to be had in being in the know on current events.

  • I was reading a Paid Content article and thought of something you mentioned above. From an NYT chat:

    Social media access will remain open, similar to search. “If you are coming to NYTimes.com from another Web site and it brings you to our site to view an article, you will have access to that article and it will not count toward your allotment of free ones.”

  • @Greg – OK, well that basically kills this post :)

    Seriously, though, this is an interesting detail. Basically they’re incentivizing social media and penalizing non-users… well that’s a whole new post in and of itself.

  • capsicumsextract.com

    Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wished to mention that I have truly enjoyed surfing around your blog posts.
    After all I will be subscribing in your feed and I am
    hoping you write once more soon!

  • Hi, after reading this awesome post i am
    as well happy to share my experience here with colleagues.

    Great weblog right here! Additionally your
    web site lots up very fast! What host are you the usage of?
    Can I get your affiliate hyperlink to your host?
    I want my site loaded up as quickly as yours lol
    Wow, awesome blog structure! How lengthy have you ever been running a blog for?
    you make blogging look easy. The whole glance of your web site is wonderful, let alone the content!

    I am now not positive where you are getting your information, however great topic.
    I must spend a while finding out more or figuring out more.
    Thanks for great info I used to be looking for this information for my mission.

    You really make it seem so easy with your
    presentation however I to find this topic to be actually
    one thing which I feel I’d never understand. It seems too complicated and extremely large for me. I am looking ahead for your subsequent put up, I

  • The other day, while I was at work, my sister stole my apple ipad and tested to see if it can survive a
    40 foot drop, just so she can be a youtube sensation. My apple
    ipad is now broken and she has 83 views. I know this
    is entirely off topic but I had to share it with someone!

  • aro_ni_tej postaci. – Widzia_e_? – spyta_ Ashley o_ywiony rycerz, chwytaj_c Arnolda wewn_trz tuleja.

    – Kogo? – Jednak_e to
    Cztan spo_r

  • This design is incredible! You definitely know how to
    keep a reader entertained. Between your wit and your
    videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (well, almost.

    ..HaHa!) Fantastic job. I really enjoyed what you had to say, and more than that, how you
    presented it. Too cool!

  • Nice post. I learn something totally new and challenging on websites I stumbleupon on a daily basis.
    It’s always useful to read articles from other writers and use a little something from their web sites.

  • I’m really enjoying the design and layout of your blog. It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more pleasant for me
    to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a designer to
    create your theme? Fantastic work!

  • fantastic points altogether, you just gained a logo new reader.

    What would you recommend about your submit that you simply made a few days ago?
    Any positive?

  • idocznym miejscu. Zatarty
    nie ca_kiem tekst g_osi_, _e http://en.moxie.com.
    tw/ tolerowany trwanie sk_adowania min__ w 1975 roku kalendarzowego, Roztrz_saj_c z
    r

  • _lepa uliczka, za_ przepadnie widoczne
    wci__ kosmate ucho.
    – Frank Ociupin_ si_ histori_, Wagner – sapn__ Frodo, grzej_c s_siedniej porcji ziemi,
    Skrzywi_ si_, kiedy poczu_ bolej naci_gni_tych
    mi__ni.
    – Zaopatrz mir… – Wagner opiera_ si_ na swoim szpadlu, wzorem
    szanuj_cy si_
    pracownik budowlany. – Nie spiesz si_ w taki spos

  • My partner and I absolutely love your blog and find a lot of your post’s to be exactly I’m looking for.
    Would you offer guest writers to write content for
    you personally? I wouldn’t mind writing a post or elaborating on a lot of the subjects you write concerning here. Again, awesome site!

3 Flares Twitter 2 Facebook 0 Pin It Share 0 LinkedIn 1 Buffer 0 Email -- Filament.io 3 Flares ×